An extract from another interesting article from the team at "Personnel Today". Click on the link to find our more or register for their regular updates:
Tolerance of discrimination at work is arguably at an all-time low. But if employers want to escape vicarious liability for the discriminatory acts of their employees, they need to do more than just have policies in place, argues Shoshana Bacall.
Anti-discrimination policies were all the rage when the Equality Act 2010 came into force. But apart from adding to an already unwieldy staff handbook, what purpose are these policies really serving?
On their own, these policies do little more than expose employers for not meeting their own self-proclaimed standards: for example, committing to investigate all complaints of harassment, informal or formal, and to training all managers.
Despite being on the to-do list, many employers reluctantly admit that training has not been carried out for some time, if at all: line managers have been dealing with discrimination and harassment complaints ad-hoc without any reference to the organisation’s policy at all.
Setting acceptable behaviour
Discrimination claims can be enormously damaging, exposing the employer, and individual perpetrator, to lasting reputational damage, uncapped compensation and irreparable divisions in the workforce.
Encouraging an appropriate workplace culture and setting clear standards of what isn’t acceptable have never been more important. Behaviour that was once tolerated is now vigorously rejected as unacceptable or even toxic: individuals are empowered and informed to call out anti-equality behaviour wherever they find it.The Act enshrines the basic human right that difference should not be a barrier to equality of opportunity: it is unlawful to harass, victimise or treat someone less favourably than another person because of certain characteristics that are protected: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation.
How to take full advantage of an invaluable defence
What even the most established employers don’t realise is that the Act provides an invaluable statutory defence to add to their suit of armour against discrimination claims arising from an employee’s behaviour. But they cannot deploy this unless they take some simple reasonable steps.
It is unrealistic to expect that a workplace will never encounter a discrimination complaint and the law doesn’t expect it either. The threshold expected of employers is to have taken “all reasonable steps” to prevent staff from carrying out discriminatory acts in the course of employment.
A common and costly mistake is an employers’ belief that having anti-discrimination/harassment policies among their suite of policies is enough to trigger the statutory defence coming to their rescue. It isn’t. Having an up-to-date policy is just the starting point.
Employment tribunals expect employers to pay more than lip service to policies: anti-discriminatory policies aren’t worth the paper they are written on unless they are backed up with more concerted action.
Encouraging an appropriate workplace culture and setting clear standards of what isn’t acceptable have never been more important. Behaviour that was once tolerated is now vigorously rejected as unacceptable or even toxic”
So, how can employers put themselves in a position where they can take full advantage of the statutory defence if faced with a discrimination claim?
Know your policies, don’t just own your policies
Discrimination is deeply personal, resulting in wide-ranging disparity in people’s reactions to the same behaviour. What offends one person may humour another and none of us can profess to be the expert, judge and jury of another person’s feelings. This is why we advise clients that the key to reducing the scope for discrimination in the workplace is training staff on equality law and their anti-discrimination policies.
Equality training should be part of the regular training calendar for all staff, from the most senior to the most junior. Ideally it would be included as part of the induction process for new starters to demonstrate from the outset the organisation’s commitment to an inclusive working environment with zero tolerance to discrimination. An obvious, but often forgotten step, is to log attendance of training to evidence the reasonable steps an organisation has taken.